Con * *
I didnt want to Hi-jack Scott thread either, so presto- -a new one*
Yeah I guess their reasoning is if your not working ,your not deserving of 14 take homes.
I don't know. It seems that if your not using- your not using -
I dont know if its fair or not > >
But that's the way they roll- If you show that your a productive member of society and not sitting home getting welfare checks, your entitled to take 14 bottles home. If your not> well then, you have the time to go get them.
I guess if you think about it it makes sense to make sure the people that have to be at work have the easiest path of resistance,. With the ..samples,see your counselor, pay the bill... and assorted other things that could slow people down ,having 14 bottles should really be for working people 1st.- but not only-
There is no-way Im going to blow this deal because I dont have a paystub. If Im not working when the time comes around when they ask for one, I WILL work something out.- They probably will question why I didn't tell them I changed jobs when they see a differnt company on the stub- but again,Ill cross that bridge when I come to it
Talk to ya soon
muchlove&respect
jack
Aw hell, thats right Jack, you just got laid off...slipped my mind with everything else going on...thats why it didnt connect at first...im thinking, what ?...they know he's working, he's been on the juice for awhile now...aw holy hell...for sure not say a word unless they ask...I agree pretty much with the Take Home policy...but like anything, their should be exceptions and a case by case scenario based on the persons past history...its a big deal, bi-monthly...not having to go to the clinic every week...damn...thats HUGE !!
